Benjamin R. Kanter
16 March 2019
How do we get from point A to point B? When given a treasure map, one strategy would be to take 10 steps North and 5 steps East
(path integration). Another strategy would be to walk to the umbrella, then turn right and walk until seeing a red flag
(landmark-based navigation).
In darkness, you use path integration which relies on self-motion information. Over long distances you would eventually become
lost and need to see a landmark to reorient yourself. In everday life do we just rely on what we see, or is that somehow
integrated with self-motion information?
With every step we take the visual scene also changes by a fixed amount. To disentangle these two sources of information,
researchers had rats walk around a circular track enclosed in a planetarium-like dome. Projecting landmarks onto this dome
enables full control over the rat's visual scene. The experimenters also recorded neurons in the brain's navigation center
to measure where the rat thought it was. To test whether the rats were relying on landmarks, they doubled the speed of the
landmarks relative to the rat. Surprisingly, this tricked the rats into thinking they had moved twice as far (i.e. the brain
was only using landmarks). The big question is: What happens when the visual information disappears? They turned the projector
off and the rat's sense of speed abruptly switched to halfway between normal speed and super speed. This altered self-motion
information persisted for all future laps around the track.
This immersive virtual reality experiment enabled unprecedented control over information used to navigate.
Not only are landmarks used to correct errors in our internal step-counter, but that step-counter is also continuously
shaped by visual feedback. Future experiments are needed to understand how landmarks, speed, and direction are integrated
in the brain to support successful navigation.